Is carpal tunnel work related ?

 Home  Education About Carpal Tunnel Links Blog About Custom Rich-Text Page Blank Custom 3

Genetics More Important than Work for Carpal Tunnel: Top [02/21/07]

Carpal tunnel syndrome is more likely to be associated with genetics than occupational exposure, according to a study presented last week to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Dr. David Ring, senior author of the study, said his research team performed a qualitative analysis on 43 scientific studies that investigated direct or indirect risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome, published from 1981 to 2005. Although 18 of those studies showed an association between occupational risk factors and carpal tunnel, the association was weak and plausibility was poor, the authors concluded. "This application of stringent science to theories of causation may affect claims of disability, workers' compensation and personal injury," Ring said in a press release from the academy. "It should also influence the information that physicians are providing their patients about carpal tunnel syndrome. Physicians have the power to increase or decrease illness and disability with their words. In my opinion, we should provide patients with the most optimistic, positive, practical and enabling illness concepts that are consistent with the best available scientific data."

Ring is an assistant professor of orthopedic surgery and a hand and upper extremity surgeon at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

According to the study, average scores for biological factors such as genetics, race, and age were double those of occupational factors such as type of work, amount of repetitive hand use, and vibration. In addition, the average strength of causal association was about three times as strong for biological factors as it was for occupational factors.

"The belief that carpal tunnel syndrome is caused by occupational exposures is based upon limited data of variable quality with relatively low scores on a quantitative measure of causal association," the authors said. "Given the remarkable impact of such beliefs on society, it would be irresponsible of us to support an association between occupation and (carpal tunnel syndrome) without convincing evidence according to very strict criteria. Such evidence is currently lacking and (carpal tunnel syndrome) is most accurately and
most optimally considered an idiopathic condition with a substantial genetic association."

Source: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

MRI as Meaningless tests Many people without back pain have disc bulges and protrusions on MRI studies. They are of little diagnostic value and more importantly can lead to unnecessary and costly treatment. References • Eur J Rad 2005 September • MRI of lumbar spine in people without back pain NEJM July 1994 • Boden SD Davis Abnormal MRI scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects JBJS 1990 • MRI availability appears to increase Low back surgery( Fiore 2009) • Videman Battie Spine 2003 to investigate the association between different spinal MRI findings and LBP adjusting for occupational physical loading smoking genetics Conclusion the sensitivities of the only significant MrI Parameters= disc height or narrowing and annular tears are POOR and these findings are of limited clinical importance • MRI without clear indications led to a cascade of subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic services (including surgery), which generally occurred within 6 months after imaging. • * This cascade was more related to the MRI than to severity, pain indicators, or demographic characteristics. • * Even after grouping by severity and controlling for pain indicators and demographic factors, early MRI (receipt <30 d postonset) was significantly associated with a large and sustained escalation in medical costs, reflecting increases in overall medical utilization, which was greater than the costs for the no MRI and timely (receipt >42 d postonset) groups. • * Study results provide evidence to promote provider and patient conversations to help patients choose care that is based on evidence, free from harm, less costly, and truly necessary. •